Microsoft Teams aims to challenge Slack in every aspect.
The team behind Slack, the wildly popular Internet chat (IRC) platform, raised nearly $20 million in funding for its first endeavor, a role-playing virtual world video game named Glitch. Appropriately named, Glitch was “deactivated” just over a year after launch, and the team took everything they’d learned in those initial few years and again raised nearly $20 million to fund Slack.
Slack
In 2016, Slack was ranked #1 on the Forbes Cloud 100 list, and in 2017 it was valued at over $5 billion. Cloud-based collaborative software helps teams stay organized, maintain a solid but transparent communication base, and receive real-time updates. To the transparency point, Slack is an acronym for “Searchable Log of All Conversation and Knowledge.”
Slack advertises itself as a “freemium” product – a free product with a selection of premium features offered at a cost. Within 24 hours of launch, Slack documented over 8,000 users signing up for the platform. Within two years, that number increased to 10,000 new active users signing up weekly and now boasts more than four million daily active users. Considering there are more than one million paying customers using the premium model, at $80-$150 per user per year, the valuation isn’t farfetched. Users that add a Google Apps subscription are saddled with another $60-$120 a year, for a $140-270 per user price tag. It’s no surprise that in 2017, TechCrunch recognized Slack as Best Startup of the Year at the Crunchies Awards.
Transparency was a major factor behind the rise of cloud-based collaborative software demand, as was the growing popularity of the remote workforce. Telecommuters now represent a much larger portion of the professional presence in every organization, from small teams to global enterprises. Slack was created to marry the Internet chat room with the topical forums populated by so many IT professionals, but also file storage and direct messaging needs. Designed as an organizational tool, the communication platform is widely used as a community forum with a social focus. The key professional tools are there, but Slack also includes memes and emojis and, to a degree, a semi-customizable user interface.
Slack vs. Microsoft Teams
Is the Slack vs. Microsoft Teams showdown the modernized tale of the underdog vs. the giant? Microsoft already has Skype for Business in its product suite, allowing organizations to utilize a professional digital communications platform for text chat, voice calls, and video conferencing. Adding a collaborative spin seemed like a natural progression from the organization that delivered Microsoft Word, OneDrive, SharePoint, and many other software applications catering to productivity needs. You might think, wouldn’t acquiring Slack and integrating the platform into its family of products make more sense from a practical standpoint? Microsoft may have been thinking along these same lines in 2016 when the rumor mill was working overtime with hints of a Microsoft bid to acquire Slack. However, when you can create what you deem the perfect product as the at-large experts, why buy something you’d then need to break down and re-build to integrate?
Slack likes its position as the underdog. Some features that are considered benefits by some are viewed as hindrances by others:
- Text-heavy and line-oriented user interface
- Secret commands for user customization
- No email or file storage
- Data is stored on proprietary cloud servers
- There is no built-in integration with many professional productivity apps
- Integration with platforms like Trello, Zendesk, and GitHub is supported
Slack prides itself on its open-source platform, its personalized approach to customer service, and overall user experience. To this point, Slack paid for a full-page advertisement upon the launch of Microsoft Teams with a thinly veiled condescending “welcome” message full of advice aimed directly at Microsoft upon its entry into the collaborative market with Microsoft Teams.
Did Microsoft feel threatened? Doubtful. First, Microsoft Teams is an integrated part of the subscription-based Office 365 productivity suite, with no additional account sign-up or downloading/onboarding. What does this mean? Ultimately, the standout point is that there is no added cost per user/seat. Microsoft Teams simplifies onboarding further without a free or standalone tier since it’s already included with Office 365 Business Essentials, Business Premium, Enterprise E1, E3, and E5 plans. Because of Office 365, users know others in the same Groups and can create smaller private Groups.
Microsoft Teams also integrates with Skype for Business, offering one major element that Slack lacks: a calling feature (audio or video). Perhaps the feature that users will love the most is that Microsoft Teams incorporates every app in the Office 365 suite into Microsoft Teams in a custom tab format.
- Click a particular team
- Select “Add Tab” in the top right corner
- Then add your Microsoft choices:
- Word
- Excel
- Meetings
- Notes
- Planner
- PowerPoint
- SharePoint
- OneNote free (from the iTunes Store)
- And others
These apps are “opened” within Microsoft Teams with full functionality, and each integrates seamlessly. Slack and Microsoft Teams have slightly different target markets, to be fair, but the gap is closing. Users with an Office 365 Business or Enterprise subscription pay closer to $60 annually for the Business Premium tier. Users also have access to Exchange email, a terabyte of OneDrive for Business storage, Skype for Business, and Microsoft Teams with this subscription, and upgrading to the full suite of desktop Office apps with the E3 plan goes up to $240 per user per year. The intrinsic value is apparent.
- When a Team is created in Microsoft Teams, a SharePoint directory is also provisioned with a folder for each channel automatically. Content is still easily searchable.
Microsoft Teams is the brainchild of a global enterprise with 85 million commercial customers with ideas to keep them close to home. Including Microsoft Teams and deploying for use is simple enough and undoubtedly intentional.